Author(s)

Yuan Chen

Corresponding Author

Yuan Chen

Abstract

Against the backdrop of changing competitive dynamics in the engineering supervision industry within a highly open market environment, this paper focuses on the issues of standardization and effectiveness in engineering supervision bidding and evaluation. It aims to systematize evaluation methods suitable for highly open markets through case analysis. Based on the supervision bidding practice of a large public building project, and employing case analysis and process decomposition methods, this study systematically analyzes the entire bidding and evaluation process of the project. It summarizes a four-dimensional evaluation framework emphasizing "comprehensive strength assessment, enhanced feasibility evaluation of proposals, focus on verification of past project performance quality, and inclusion of service response efficiency scoring." The operational essentials and time node management methods for each evaluation stage are elaborated. The purpose is to demonstrate that this four-dimensional framework can effectively adapt to the characteristics of diverse bidding entities and information transparency in highly open markets, improve the fairness and scientific rigor of evaluation results, and provide a reference for supervision bidding and evaluation in similar projects.

Keywords

Highly Open Market, Engineering Supervision, Bidding and Evaluation Methods, Large Public Buildings