Author(s)

Xian Wu

Corresponding Author

Xian Wu

Abstract

This article researches the application of methods in the bidding and evaluation of construction engineering projects. It discusses four application approaches: quantitative scoring by weight in the comprehensive evaluation method, screening via the reviewed lowest bid price method, defining the quotation range using the reasonable low price method, and commercial bid ranking under a technically qualified system. It analyzes the operational processes and applicable scenarios of each method. Furthermore, it explores three optimization strategies: refining evaluation indicators to reduce subjective bias, dynamically adjusting weights to suit project needs, and introducing big data to assist review decisions, proposing targeted implementation paths. The aim is to demonstrate that by scientifically selecting evaluation methods combined with optimization strategies, the problems of traditional methods being disconnected from project requirements, insufficient review fairness, and low efficiency can be solved, achieving the effects of improving evaluation accuracy, ensuring review fairness, and increasing bidding efficiency, thereby providing practical reference for the standardized conduct of bidding and evaluation work in construction engineering.

Keywords

Construction Engineering, Bidding and Evaluation, Quantitative Scoring, Lowest Bid Price Method, Defining Quotation Range