Author(s)

Yi Zou, Yi Xu

Corresponding Author

Yi Xu

Abstract

To investigate the application of minimally invasive total hip replacement and traditional hip replacement in the treatment of advanced hip arthropathy, and to evaluate their therapeutic effect and life quality compact, a total of 76 patients with advanced hip disease who were treated between April 2015 and July 2017 were enrolled in this study. According to the randomized digital table method, 38 patients in the reference group were treated with traditional hip replacement. The 38 patients in the analysis group were treated with minimally invasive hip replacement surgery and the clinical therapeutic effect was summarized. Results are as follows: ① Efficacy: The operation time of the analysis group was longer than that of the control group, but the amount of bleeding during operation and postoperative drainage were significantly less than those of the control group (P <0.05). After the treatment, VAS score and Harris score are improved in both groups. And in pairwise comparison, the improvement in the analysis group is higher(P<0.05). ②And quality of life: After treatment, the quality of life scores of the two groups were significantly improved in physical function, social function, body pain, emotional performance, mental health and activity ability, and the analysis group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p <0.05). In consequence, compared with the traditional hip replacement, minimally invasive total hip replacement is more effective in the treatment of advanced hip arthroplasty. It is helpful to reduce the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage and pain score, early recovery of the affected joint function, and improve the life quality of the patients, thus having important practical and promotional value.

Keywords

Minimally invasive hip replacement, traditional hip replacement, hip arthropathy, efficacy, life quality.