Author(s)

Zhang Yaping

Corresponding Author

Zhang Yaping

Abstract

As the product of the development of science and technology to a certain extent and stage, criminal technology, criminal technology identification and judicial identification have been harmed by the vague and mixed use of theory and practice due to the application of their own technical means, which has affected the scientization of investigation, restricted the scientization of trial and even hindered the deepening of judicial identification system reform. The causes and changes of its fuzzy and mixed use are traced back and investigated. It is found that the differences between them in the scope of technology, reliability and function of results should be distinguished. In the process of deepening the reform of judicial identification system, in addition to the preliminary theoretical demarcation of criminal technology, criminal technology identification and judicial identification, it is also necessary to establish the access system and elimination system of judicial identification technology, and the transformation mechanism from criminal technology identification to judicial identification to adjust to it.

Keywords

Criminal technology, Criminal technology identification, Judicial identification, Relationship